How many times did the apostle Peter deny Jesus? Denial of the Apostle Peter

08.08.2019 Auto/Moto

Chapter 18

DID PETER DENY JESUS?

And Beelzebub, the father and ruler of all devils, was alarmed. He clearly saw that his power over people would end forever, unless Christ renounced his preaching. He was alarmed, but did not lose heart and incited the Pharisees and scribes submissive to him to insult and torment Christ as much as possible, and advised Christ’s disciples to run away and leave him alone.

Leo Tolstoy, “The Destruction of Hell and Its Restoration,” 1903 (169).

That Peter belongs to a special, and, moreover, primary place among the other apostles, against this, of course, there cannot be an honest and reasonable dispute. You can argue about the meaning and significance of this fact, but not about the fact itself; to argue about it means to oppose the will of the Lord himself and His election.

Archpriest Sergius Bulgakov, “Two Chief Apostles”, 1923 (170).

There is a dark legend associated with the arrest of Jesus, dating back to ancient times. We are talking about the so-called “denial of Peter.” Let me briefly remind you of the essence of this incident. During the Last Supper, Peter assured Jesus that "will lay down his soul" for him, to which Jesus replied: “Will you lay down your soul for me? Truly, truly, I say to you, the rooster will not crow until you have denied Me three times.”(John 13:37-38).

Everything happened as Jesus predicted. In the courtyard of the house of Ananus, where the arrested Christ was taken for interrogation, Peter, who came there and was almost exposed by the servants of the high priest, actually declared three times that he did not know any Jesus. This episode was subsequently inflated by pious interpreters of the Gospels to the size of a real crime, almost equating Peter with Judas.

“The great betrayal lies in his cowardice”- says Renan (171).

"Coward Student"- concludes Innocent, Archbishop of Kherson and Tauride (172).

"Proved to be weak"- Blessed Theophylact (173).

"Betrayal"- Hungarian philosopher Gustav Gece (174).

"Astonishing cowardice"- Weddig Fricke, German doctor of jurisprudence and part-time biblical scholar (175).

This is how harshly and adamantly people judge Peter, who themselves have never found themselves in such a situation and who do not even know firsthand what it is - playing with death!

The absurdity of all the accusations brought against Peter is clearly visible if we carefully analyze the events that immediately followed the arrest of Christ.

Now the “capture group,” led by Judas Iscariot, appeared between the trees of the Garden of Gethsemane. The intentions of those who came are obvious - to take Jesus away with them by force. "Seeing where things are going" The disciples said to Jesus: "God! Shall we strike with a sword?(Luke 22:49), and Peter, without waiting for an answer, pulled out a sword hidden under his clothes and, swinging, hit one of the high priest’s servants on the head, cutting off his ear (John 18:10).

Where is Peter’s weakness, indecision or cowardice in this act? Not paying attention to the numerical superiority of the enemy, Peter rushed like a lion to the defense of his beloved teacher, and there is no doubt that he would have fought to the last, would have fought until he himself fell, lifeless, next to Christ on the ground.

But Jesus did not want this sacrifice. Having died himself, and knowing this, he wanted his students to continue his Great Work. Even during his last prayer, he asked for his disciples: “I gave them Your word, and the world hated them, because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world. I do not pray that You take them out of the world, but that You keep them from evil.”(John 17:14-15). And now, when a brawl broke out, ready to instantly develop into great bloodshed, Jesus said “Leave it alone, that’s enough!”- ordered his disciples to stop (John 16:11-15).

What should Peter have done in this situation? Continue the fight? But Jesus made it clear to him that he did not need this sacrifice. Let yourself and your teacher be arrested? But Jesus did not at all want the apostles to be captured with him, this is clear from his words addressed to the servants of the high priest: "If you are looking for Me, leave them(apostles - A.L.), let them go"(John 18:8). And if it was impossible to fight, and it was also impossible to surrender, then what could poor Peter do? There is only one thing - retreat into the darkness!

Anyone who spits at the apostles, who allegedly became afraid and fled into the bushes, is not able to understand an elementary thing: it was Jesus himself, with the best intentions, who extinguished their will to resist. In a fight, in battle, the emotional mood is extremely important. And if anyone, even the bravest and strong man warn in advance that resistance is pointless and that it is best to lay down arms, then doubts will creep into his soul, and he will no longer be able to fight.

Let's see, however, how events unfolded further. When the enemies took Jesus bound into the city, "Peter followed Him from afar"(Mark 14:54). It took a lot of courage to follow a crowd of enemies even “from afar.” And Peter could be convinced that they did not intend to joke when, before his eyes, a young man from nearby houses was captured, who, apparently awakened by the noise of the struggle, jumped out into the street and, “wrapped in a veil over his naked body, he followed Him”(Mark 14:51). He was saved only by escaping from the hands of the soldiers, “leaving the veil, he ran away from them naked”(Mark 14:52). If Peter had been caught by the guards, he would, of course, have been in trouble!

Following the arrested Jesus, Peter went into the courtyard of Ananus and sat down near the fire among the people of the high priest. Here we need to talk not even about Peter’s courage, but about real heroism on his part! Very excited and, probably, battered from a recent fight in the Garden of Gethsemane, with an incorrect Galilean accent (the natives of Galilee pronounced some vowel sounds in a special way, so in conversation they could easily be distinguished from the inhabitants of Judea), known to almost all of Jerusalem as one Of the main disciples of Jesus, Peter took a mortal risk by climbing into the very enemy’s lair. Moreover, he did not leave the courtyard, even when the servants of the high priest approached him three times with tricky questions, wanting to find out if he was a disciple of the Galilean who had just been arrested! If a cowardly person were in Peter’s place, he would have run away after the first question, but Peter remained in place after the second, and even after the third, and only when somewhere outside the city a rooster suddenly crowed, recalling the recent prophecy of Jesus, stretched to the limit Peter’s nerves could not stand it, and he, sobbing, got up and wandered away. And the final touch to his psychological portrait. If he were a coward, as other idle scribblers often try to portray him as, he would most likely leave the yard with ostentatious indifference, trying not to give himself away in any way, and only then, perhaps, give vent to his feelings. But with Peter it’s the other way around! At first "started to cry"(Mark 14:72), and only then left the court of the high priest.

So, from our analysis it follows that Peter, at the time of his arrest and shortly after it, dared to do much more than his teacher could have demanded of him. Jesus only wanted him to save his life, and Peter, taking desperate risks, on his own initiative went after him into the very den of his enemies. For what purpose? Obviously, in order to find out in more detail about the future fate of his beloved teacher. It is quite possible that many important details of the interrogation of Jesus by Ananus and Caiaphas came to us only thanks to the dedication of Peter, who was able to find out them while among the servants of the high priest. Peter actually took on the role of an intelligence officer, and, let’s not be afraid of this word, like a real intelligence officer, he had to not give himself away with a single word or a single gesture. Anyone who calls the apostle a coward probably believes that in response to the question of the servants of the high priest - “Did we not see you with Him?” - he had to jump up shouting: “Yes, I am!” I was with Him! And immediately go to prison, and then to death.

Well, let’s say, Peter would have called himself a disciple of Christ, well, died with him on Calvary, and what, would this have brought at least some benefit to the movement founded by Jesus? Absolutely none! Moreover, it is even possible that without Peter this movement would never have taken place at all!

The role of the Apostle Peter in the subsequent development of Christianity cannot be overestimated. After the death of Jesus, he was one of the main organizers of the community of the first followers of Christ in Jerusalem. It was at his insistence that instead of Judas Iscariot, who had dropped out of the Twelve, a new apostle, Matthias, was chosen by lot (Acts 1:15-26). Peter was the first to preach after Pentecost (Acts 2:14-36). Not content with preaching the teachings of Christ in Jerusalem, Peter undertook a series of missionary trips to the countries of the Middle East. In 37, he met in Jerusalem with Saul, the future Apostle Paul, directly teaching the latter the Gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:18). In 49 or 50, Peter participated in the preparation of the Apostolic Council in Jerusalem and opened it with a speech (Acts 15:4-14). Resuming his travels after this, Peter visited various regions of Asia Minor and, possibly, Corinth, and later settled in Rome, founding a Christian community. There, according to Tradition, he was executed between 64 and 68 years. According to Origen, Peter, at his own request, was crucified upside down, because he considered himself unworthy to die in the same way as Christ died.

Any unbiased reader, I hope, will agree that there was, in essence, no “renunciation,” much less “betrayal,” on his part. What happened then? And it was the only possible behavior in that dramatic situation, conditioned by the circumstances. Peter, in full accordance with the wishes of Christ, tried to preserve his life, which was necessary for future achievements. Jump up shouting “It’s me!” and any fool can die incompetently, but to stand at the helm of the greatest social movement in history - this, you know, is not given to everyone!

At this point I foresee the indignant cry of Peter’s critics: Jesus himself said that Peter would deny him! Did he say these terrible words or didn’t he say them?!

Pronounced. Well, so what? Jesus generally loved bright, aphoristic, one might even say, paradoxical speech. When he told the same Peter that he would do them with his brother Andrei "fishers of men", what did you mean? That Peter will actually walk the streets with a rope in his hands and tie up people? It's the same with "renunciation." Having said this, Jesus meant that Peter would refuse to get acquainted with him only for appearances, only in order to deceive his enemies, but in his soul, of course, he would remain faithful to the teacher. One can only be amazed at the self-control of Christ, who even on the eve of the catastrophe could not resist good-naturedly teasing Peter, making fun of him in his usual manner!

Do Peter’s critics really think that the apostle even for a moment regretted his collaboration with Jesus? If so, then why did he remain in the courtyard of the high priest after the first dangerous question? I would have taken it and left, spitting on everything! Why did you stay after the second one? Why did he even go into this yard if he was so cowardly?!

And further. For some reason, no one accuses those apostles who remained in the Garden of Gethsemane and did not follow the arrested Jesus of betrayal, but Peter is accused. It turns out that if he had not followed Jesus, then, like everyone else, he would have remained unsullied, but if he did, that means he is a coward and a traitor! Some strange logic!

So, friends, no matter what you say, something in this dark story does not fit, does not fit in with the imaginary renunciation of the supreme apostle! Oops, it doesn't dock!

And here's what else is interesting. Peter's fiercest critics are always those who risk their own lives the least. The first Christians, who all the time existed under the sword of Damocles of the most severe persecution for the faith, did not focus too much attention on this, let’s face it, it’s not that important episode from the gospel story. For example, Origen, polemicizing with Celsus, speaks of "weaknesses" Peter, without condemning him at all for this and even justifying him (177). And Paul never mentions this episode, although at times he was angry with Peter and, probably, could, on occasion, reproach him for this. But the further from the gospel events, the more adamant the critics became. And when Christianity became the dominant religion, and the possibility of suffering for one’s faith became only hypothetical, this is where the most severe accusations began to fall! And no wonder! Just as during war the most desperate brave men and strategists are found not in the trenches, but in the deep rear, so the most principled judges of the Apostle Peter found refuge at desks in the quiet of cozy and safe offices.

From the book of the Four Gospels author (Taushev) Averky

From the book Lessons for Sunday School author Vernikovskaya Larisa Fedorovna

How the Apostle Peter, according to the word of Jesus, finds a coin. You know that they collect money from us to build and decorate churches. This was the case in Palestine, where there was even a certain tax for this. One day in Capernaum, tax collectors for the decoration of the temple came to Jesus for money.

From the book Study Guide Holy Scripture New Testament. Four Gospels. author (Taushev) Averky

The Apostle Peter confesses Jesus Christ as the Son of God (Matt. 16:13-20; Mark 8:27-30; Luke 9:18-21). From Bethsaida-Julia the Lord went with His disciples to the borders of Caesarea Philippi. This city (previously called Panea and located on the northern border of the tribe of Nephalim, at

From the book The Party That Jesus Formed author Lazarenkov Andrey

Chapter 18 DID PETER DENY JESUS? And Beelzebub, the father and ruler of all devils, was alarmed. He clearly saw that his power over people would end forever, unless Christ renounced his preaching. He was alarmed, but did not lose heart and incited those submissive to him

From the book Second Epistle of Peter and Epistle of Jude by Lucas Dick

3) Simon Peter, servant and Apostle of Jesus Christ When Jesus washed the feet of His disciples, He said: “Truly, truly, I say to you, a servant is not greater than his master, and an apostolos (apostolos) is not greater than the one who sent him” (John 13:16) . The reason why the figure of Peter is so important for us today and

From the book of the Gospel of Mark by English Donald

7. Peter denies Jesus (14:66–72) While Peter was in the court below, one of the high priest’s maids came 67 And when she saw Peter warming himself and looked at him, she said, “You also were with Jesus of Nazareth.” 68 But he denied, saying: I do not know and do not understand what you are saying. And went out

From the book The Explanatory Bible. Volume 10 author Lopukhin Alexander

22. Then the disciples looked around at each other, wondering who He was talking about. 23 Now one of His disciples, whom Jesus loved, was reclining at Jesus’ breast. 24. Simon Peter made a sign to him and asked who it was that he was talking about. 25. He fell to the chest of Jesus and said to Him: Lord! Who

From the book Matrona of Moscow will definitely help everyone! author Chudnova Anna

“It was in vain that Nicholas renounced...” Mother knew everything in advance about what awaited Russia, about the hardships of the coming years, about the horror of revolutionary times. She tried to warn as best she could, but not everyone believed her. And how could you believe such a thing? People could not imagine that they would be destroyed

From the book Peter, Paul and Mary Magdalene [Followers of Jesus in History and Legends] by Erman Barth D.

The Rocky Beginning: Peter During Jesus' Ministry It's hard to say how many people called Peter actually show a rocky character. However, it is clear that the real Peter was not like that. Not a stone at all, Peter was much more like quicksand, according to

From the book of the Bible. Modern translation (BTI, trans. Kulakova) author's Bible

Peter - the messenger of Jesus We have already seen that in the New Testament Gospels the versions of Simon's first acquaintance with Jesus and how he received his nickname diverge noticeably (cf. Mark 1:16-18, John 1:35-42 and Luke 5:1–11). But they agree that soon after their first meeting Jesus found

From the book of the Bible. New Russian translation (NRT, RSJ, Biblica) author's Bible

Peter at the time of Jesus' arrest We have already noted that Peter's character was finally revealed at the decisive moment of Jesus' arrest. Although he was one of the three trusted "inner circle" disciples whom Jesus took with him when he went alone to pray, Peter

From the book Interpretation of the Gospel author Gladkov Boris Ilyich

Peter at the time of Jesus' crucifixion According to the earliest gospel text, the only followers of Jesus who saw him crucified from afar were a few women who accompanied him on his journey from Galilee to Jerusalem for his annual

From the author's book

Peter Recognizes Jesus as the Messiah 13 Having come to the region of Caesarea Philippi, Jesus began to ask His disciples: “Who do people say the Son of Man is?” 14 And they said: “Some say John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others say Jeremiah or one from the prophets.”15 “And you? -

From the author's book

Peter recognizes Jesus as the Messiah (Mark 8:27–30; Luke 9:18–21)13 When Jesus came to the area around Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples: “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”14 The disciples answered: “Some say that You are John the Baptist, others that Elijah, and still others that

From the author's book

Peter recognizes Jesus as the Christ (Matthew 16:13–16; Mark 8:27–29)18 One day, when Jesus was praying alone and His disciples were not far from Him, He asked them: “Who do the people say that I am?”19 They They answered: - For John the Baptist; others say that you are Elijah, and still others that you are one of

From the author's book

CHAPTER 23. Journey of Jesus to Jerusalem for the Feast of Tabernacles. Talk about Him. Jesus' speech about himself. The order of the chief priests and Pharisees to seize Jesus. The feast of the Jews was approaching - the setting up of tabernacles, established in memory of the forty-year wandering of the Jews in

Today we glorify all the saints of our Church who are holy by the holiness of God. And we are all called to this holiness. For this we are baptized in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, for this we partake of the Holy Mysteries of Christ, where just before communion we hear: “Holy to the holy.” If anyone is not holy, says Saint Cyril of Jerusalem on this matter, let him not approach. “There is one holy, one Lord, Jesus Christ,” and the holy father-monks from their deserts, which were the field of their spiritual battle, together with the martyrs, tell each of us about the only secret of life: “Give the blood and receive the Spirit.” Where do we get this power of dedication? Only with the Lord. We must accept in the Eucharist the blood of the First Martyr, the First Saint, the only holy Lord Jesus Christ, through Him we must partake of the Divine Spirit, in order to be able to give ourselves and be saints, Christ's.

“Whoever confesses Me before men,” the Savior tells us today in the Gospel, “I will confess him before My Heavenly Father, and whoever denies Me before men, him will I deny before My Heavenly Father.” This loyalty in the face of suffering, in the face of death, is what defines saints. To be a believer means to be faithful, and this is the only way the Church lives. Today we need to hear these words of the Savior that we can renounce our Christ and may find ourselves deprived of the Kingdom of holiness, of Divine life. How do we renounce? We deny Christ verbally when we say that we do not know Him. Can we really say that? As one woman said, she repented that when there was a population census in the 30s of the last century, where the question about religion was on the questionnaire, she wrote: “non-believer.” And millions, as if going to church, renounced their Lord in those terrible years. This renunciation may not be direct. IN " Ancient Patericon" tells about one monk who went to the city out of obedience to buy something for the monastery. There he met a very eloquent Jew who began to tell him about his faith. He listened to him and said somehow very abstractly, absently: “Perhaps what you say is true.” When he returned to the monastery, his spiritual father told him: “You are no longer a Christian. You have denied the Lord. What darkness I see in your soul! This renunciation may be the same as it was with one very learned, very educated person. Once he was asked how he, such an enlightened, such an educated person, could believe in God: “Do you really believe in Christ?” Yes, he answered, but not fanatically. This meant that his faith is by itself, and the world by itself, one does not concern the other, the world need not worry - he will not cause any trouble with his faith to this world, he will not disturb the world with anything to force respect for those vague principles on on which his faith is based.

We need to see absolutely clearly that we are only believers when we differ from the world. The very word “holy” means “different from the world”; a saint is one who is dedicated to God. We know that the temple is holy, it is different from all other buildings, because it is dedicated to God. Saturday at Old Testament was holy - it was different from all other days because it was dedicated to God. A Christian is a person who is dedicated to God, and therefore he must be different from other people. The worst thing is when we are no different from them. Not so long ago, many Christians calmly sent their children to be pioneers, Komsomol members, without even thinking that this was participation in an organization that officially and necessarily professed atheism, that is, an indirect renunciation of God. In the same way, now many of us are ready to hand over our children to any kind of torn apart, to any kind of programs, television and other, even more global programs for educating a person with the complete destruction of the most important thing that is in a person - reason, shame and conscience. And yet we seem to be believers. We live in the world, but we are called not to merge with this world, not to mix with it. We can defeat the world only by the way in which we differ from the world, that is, by the presence of God in us, that of Christ, the Divine and truly human, which does not yield anything to the corrupting beast in our faith.

You can also renounce Christ not with words, but simply with silence. Again and again, life gives us the opportunity to intercede for our Lord, when He is again insulted, when again there is dishonor, blasphemy, blasphemy around us, and the opportunity to speak out against evil, already open, arrogant, in which is the obvious presence of the devil, the murderer, the father of lies. And we remain silent again and again. When the opportunity arose for the Church to speak, when seemingly all freedoms were declared, was it really the freedom to speak only half-truths and half-lies, only lies, and not the word of truth! Previously, our Church was called the “Church of Silence” because the mouth was forcibly closed. Can it really still be this Church of Silence! If from the very beginning of the so-called perestroika the Church had raised its voice against this terrible satanic corruption that is being committed in our Fatherland, and had not remained silent, then, of course, much would have been different now. At that time, the authority of the Church was the highest, according to all sociological surveys. During the years of godless communism, people were hungry for the word of the highest truth, then debauchery was still terrifying, it shocked normal consciousness, they had not yet become accustomed to it as they are now. What is lost cannot be returned. And now, if we continue to maintain this silence, which can be perceived by society as a sign of agreement with lawlessness, it will, of course, be bad for us and for everyone who expects salvation from the Church.

But there is also a renunciation of Christ with one’s entire life. We live in such a way that we constantly renounce Christ. Too often we find ourselves only as hearers of God's Word and not as doers of it. Because of you, as the Apostle Paul speaks of precisely this kind of renunciation, the Name of God is blasphemed and subjected to reproach among the pagans. And, of course, if all the words about truth, about purity, about love that we say do not come true in our lives, then they become suspicious for those who listen to us. Both the Name of God and the Church of Christ are again being dishonored. This confession, this fidelity to Christ is costly. As in the Gospel, Christ says: “Whoever wants to be My disciple must take up the cross.” This means that we always face a choice, we must always sacrifice either Christ, His commandment, or ourselves and our well-being. There is no such thing that we can preserve both. And until there is a determination in our lives: “Thy will be done!” - not only in all the circumstances, the most terrible and sorrowful, that the Lord sends to us, but in everything that we fulfill in life, saying: “May the commandment that You gave me be fulfilled with Your help and power!” - until then our confession will not be true. The Lord warns us that whoever wants to save his life, his soul, save it in this world, will destroy it. And we know that this is exactly what always happens, and in those years of great persecution, many wanted to save their lives, and therefore they renounced Christ, and therefore they ruined their lives.

Now the world considers the most important principle of life to be precisely how to preserve your life, preserve it and acquire everything that is necessary for this life (as the world understands it). But at the same time, it is impossible not to see that the only thing that makes this life precious is lost, that which is really worth living, because without Christ, without love for Him, life is meaningless and empty, and only through life by faith, through selfless love for To the Lord and to people, through giving ourselves, through spending our life for this, we gain it. We are very feeble and weak, and none of us can say that he is stronger than Peter, who, because of one word of the maid, denied his Savior. And each of us must see today how many times he has renounced Christ, either in word, or in silence, or in his life. And we must all turn to our saints, who were also weak and fragile. They, too, sometimes had hesitations in faith, some even renounced the Lord, but they knew that the Lord, if they turned to Him with all their hearts and repentance, could restore everything. These saints remind us that although by nature we sometimes do not have the strength to resist the smallest sorrows and temptations, when the most important test comes, Christ will work in us. The Lord, through the Holy Spirit, gives consolation to every suffering and strength to every human weakness. He tells us: “Fear not, little flock!” He tells us: “Look, are not many birds sold for two assars, but each of them is in the memory of the Heavenly Father, Who cares for them and knows what will happen to each of them? Are you not more valuable than these small birds?” “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body and then are unable to do anything more.” Is it really possible that a sword or persecution, the whole Church of Saints tells us, or some kind of torment, or some kind of grief, can overcome the love of God that He has for each of us? Let us be faithful to our Lord through the intercession of all our saints. And the Lord will always be faithful to us, for He cannot, as Scripture says, be faithful to Himself.

Archpriest Alexander Shargunov, rector of the Church of St. Nicholas the Wonderworker in Pyzhi

Correspondence Calendar Charter Audio Name of God Answers Divine services School Video Library Sermons The Mystery of St. John Poetry Photo Journalism Discussions Bible Story Photobooks Apostasy Evidence Icons Poems by Father Oleg Questions Lives of the Saints Guest book Confession Statistics Site Map Prayers Father's word New Martyrs Contacts

Question No. 550

What is the difference between the denial of the Apostle Peter and the betrayal of Judas?

Vladimir L. ,France
13/02/2003

Father, please clarify these questions.
The Apostle Peter denied Christ, repented and was forgiven by the Lord.
Judas Iscariot betrayed Christ, repented, but hanged himself.

1) Is the degree of sin of Apostle Peter and Judas the same (at first glance, both seemed to have betrayed);
2) Both repented, but the result of the first repentance was forgiveness by the Lord, the result of the second was strangulation. What is the spiritual difference between such seemingly equally external repentances, in order to understand and repent correctly?

God bless you for the clarification.

Answer from Father Oleg Molenko:

1) The sin of Peter's denial and the sin of Judas' betrayal. – these are sins that are close in severity, but different in origin, direction and spiritual quality. The denial of Peter, which lives in every person (that is why it must be discovered through repentance and gotten rid of it before death), is the sin of human WEAKNESS, and the sin of betrayal and sale (for something material) of Christ is the sin of human CHOICE. This is the fundamental difference between these similar sins, which leads to opposite results.

Apostle Peter did not want and did not think of renouncing Christ. Even in front of all the other apostles, he assured that even if everyone renounced, he would not renounce even to the point of prison and death. It was a sincere desire and statement, but it had the effect of being heated. The Lord predicted the denial of all the disciples, and about Peter that he would deny three times, but He did not cease to consider them His own. About the betrayal of Judas Claim. The Lord also predicted, but called him the devil. At the same time, the Lord said that only one out of 12 would betray Him. This means that Peter and the others were above suspicion.

When the blood cooled, and the danger of being captured, thrown into prison and executed became a reality for Peter, the sinful weakness of human nature, predicted by the Lord, manifested itself in him (like in each of us), and he spontaneously denied for the sake of FEAR. This renunciation experimentally revealed to him the abyss of sinfulness of a person who had already consciously chosen the Lord, confessed Him as God, left everything for His sake and decided to follow Him. This renunciation, unexpectedly discovered by God’s permission, shows that it is not enough for a person to believe in Christ as his God and Savior (as Protestants absurdly claim), it is not enough to see His miracles and transfiguration, it is not enough to walk on the waters by the power of God, it is not enough to be chosen as disciples and apostles Christ Himself, it is not enough to be with Christ, to eat with Him, to drink with Him, to listen to Him, to pray with Him, to partake of His Body and Blood (which Peter did at the Last Supper before his denial), it is not enough to see His saints in glory (Moses and Elijah on Tabor) , for all this does not preserve from the person living in the heart of GOD. A person is born with this severe disease called the FALL, the root of which is DENYING GOD (after all, the first people Adam and Eve denied God by believing Satan) on the basis of pride. Our task is to gradually heal from this severe illness through the repentance commanded by God and the grace of the Holy Spirit given for it and to overcome our renunciation of God.

Judas hatched plans for betrayal, looked for a convenient time and increased the price of the Priceless. He not only betrayed the Lord into the hands of His enemies, but SOLD Him for money. Judas acted quite consciously and selfishly. It was his conscious choice and the manifestation of his relationship to the Lord God. Scripture tells us that he was a THIEF. A thief is a life choice. This is a choice of atheistic and misanthropic ideology and practice based on it. Stealing is the choice of a proud peace-loving person who exalts himself over others, an envious person, an unbeliever and an impatient person. From theft there is one step to murder of God and man. It is no coincidence that Satan is called in Scripture the father of lies, a murderer and a thief. As is the father, so are his children. Complementing Scripture, the Monk Nile the Myrrh-streaming Athonite in his posthumous broadcasts tells us that Judas Iscariot cohabited with his mother and killed his father. So he was a fully formed fighter against God and a wicked man, i.e. the devil, as the Lord rightly called him. And the characteristic of the devil is to justify himself in every possible way by blaming God for everything and completely killing his ability to repent or make a good change.

Irreversibility, irrepentance and rejection are the indelible stamp of the devil and devils in the flesh (such as Judas Isk., Julian the Apostate, bishops Anna and Caiaphas, M. Sergius Stragorodsky, Alexy Simansky, Pimen Izvekov, Alexy Ridiger and other leaders of modern apostasy). It's no coincidence that grave sin Judas' betrayal and apostasy of the clergy is reflected in Scripture in these words:

Jeremiah 7:
1 The sin of Judah is written with an iron chisel, inscribed with a diamond point on the tablet of their hearts and on the horns of their altars.

The hearts of apostates are like stone tablets, and the sin of apostasy is written on us with an iron chisel with a diamond tip, which speaks of the indelibility of this sin and the irreversibility of these traitors to God.

2) According to the difference in the origin of the sins of Peter and Judas, they also regretted their actions. Judas was REGRET, REGRET, ANNOYED, ANGRY WITH HIMSELF - this is how the word “repented” should be understood for Judas - for the act he committed. This annoyance with oneself had nothing to do with true REPENTANCE. It was sinful DESPAIR, which Satan inspired him to, who entered his heart through a piece of bread he accepted from the hands of the Lord. The Monk Nile the Myrrh-Streaming adds that the Lord bent twice the branches of the tree on which Judas hanged himself, but Judas threw the noose to the next highest branch until he hanged himself completely the third time. By this strangulation, he only revealed his long-standing spiritual strangulation, strangulation from addiction to material things and contempt for the commandments of God (“Thou shalt not steal,” “Thou shalt not covet what is thy neighbor’s”).

Using the example of Judas Iscariot, we see how dangerous it is to be stuck in sinful passion (for Judas the leading passion was the love of money) and in passionate thoughts. Such inertia blinds a person, betrays him into the clutches of demons, and they, through the action of passion, bring him to Betrayal of God (if possible and on occasion) and then plunge him into despair and final destruction.

God gives repentance for correction and salvation, but repentance for despair and destruction is given by the demon.

With demon-guided repentance, a person does not repent of his condition and does not seek God’s mercy to get out of it, but only MEASURES his action or deed and its cost and, seeing an obvious discrepancy, becomes very upset and annoyed with himself, comes to despair and, unable to tolerate out of pride in his ridicule and outrage at himself in the form of this discrepancy between “price” and “deed,” he commits suicide. For example, a robber has developed a careful plan to rob a large bank, cherishes dreams of having a huge amount of money, goes to work, led by demons, and a stand is waiting for him, or instead of money a “doll” is discovered, i.e. paper, and he, repenting from despair, kills himself.

So it was with Judas. Having betrayed the Lord for 30 pieces of silver into the hands of the Jewish priests who were looking for Him, Judas, blinded by the love of money, believed that Jesus would only be put in prison for a while, or, in extreme cases, “beat him a little.” He did not imagine that his Teacher would be killed so quickly with a shameful death on the cross. When demons attract a person to sin, they increase the acquisition (for Judas it is money) and its importance, but they justify and diminish the sin itself. After committing a sin, they belittle what they have acquired (Judas returned the pieces of silver to the high priests) and endlessly increase the size of the sin committed and its severity (“gave up innocent blood”), showing God as an unmerciful Judge. Demons and high priests easily deceived Judas, who was blind from passion, betraying the Lord to death. This greatly angered Judas, which is why he angrily threw the money down on the ground in front of the high priests, reproaching them for deceiving them in the price. Judas did not repent for his terrible sin, but regretted the miscalculation that resulted from his action. This is what Judas' repentance looks like.

It's a completely different matter for Peter. He sinned due to universal human weakness, manifested in unexpected and tense conditions. The Lord allowed this weakness to manifest itself in Peter. To do this, He withdrew His help and grace. This was a special providential action of the Lord, by which He prepared Peter to be the Supreme Apostle. This abandonment of God was allowed for the true humility of Peter, for his experimental knowledge of the depth of the fall and sinfulness of human nature, expelled from Paradise for this illness. Without this experienced self-knowledge, there cannot be in a person a solid foundation for humility, spiritual poverty, true repentance and crying, compassion for other people, knowledge of the greatness and significance of the redemptive work of Christ. With similar God-forsakings, the Lord visits the soul of every truly repentant ascetic, for the Lord’s goal is to reveal to us our true terrible state and from the sight of this destruction to lead us to true repentance, real confession of the Savior and Redeemer in Christ Jesus, true humility, real cleansing from sin and correction , healing of the soul, thanking God for His economy of our salvation, compassion for other people, with a way out of condemning them.

Threefold renunciation, with the aggravation of sin at each stage: “I don’t know...”, “I swear that I don’t know...”, “I swear to God that I don’t know...”, was necessary to bring a person to the depth of knowledge sin living in him. Without this (i.e., seeing a small degree of sinfulness), a person will not be able to truly repent and cry bitterly about his distance from God. An amazing picture: Peter physically stands next to the Lord, but spiritually in his heart he is far from Him. This happens with modern “Orthodox” people; physically they are in church, in temples, at shrines, but in their hearts they are far from God and do not even know about the renunciation that lives in them. That is why, on occasion, they easily renounce, betray and sell the Lord or the Truth, the Way, the Life for some low-value temporary thing.

The Lord, who measuredly allowed Peter to forsake God, Himself brings him out of it, turning it into true, unfeigned and unfeigned repentance and granting bitter, cleansing and the only cry that comforts the soul:

Luke 22:
61 Then the Lord turned and looked at Peter, and Peter remembered the word of the Lord, how He said to him: before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times.
62 And, going out, he wept bitterly.

We see a chain God's actions: the Lord’s prediction about Peter’s threefold denial of Him – abandonment of God, which led to the manifestation of the renunciation of God hidden within, – appeal to the sinner Peter – Divine glance at Peter, bringing him to consciousness of sin, – the action of God’s grace, overcoming Peter’s oblivion and reminding him of the words of the Lord ( Scripture), – Peter’s exodus to active repentance – the gift of repentant, cleansing crying.

Scripture does not tell us what happened to Peter after this, until the Lord restored him to apostolic dignity during a meal prepared by the Lord Himself. During this conversation (John 20) it turns out that Peter loves the Lord, more than the other disciples (for the Lord asked whether Peter loved more than them, and not in general about love for Himself, which He had no doubt about) and refers to this on the Lord Himself:

John 20:
15
16 Peter says to Him: Yes, Lord! You know I love you. ...
17 God! You know everything; You know I love you.

Peter's threefold questioning of whether he loved the Lord was necessary for Peter's threefold declaration of this love and the Lord's knowledge of this love. This threefold testimony of love was necessary to testify to Peter’s threefold repentance for his threefold denial of the Lord. Through this repentance and crying, Peter moved from an external pious attitude towards the Lord, in which outbursts of blood, passion, jealousy beyond reason and other similar manifestations of the old man were strong, to an internal spiritual attitude. This union of man with God into one spirit is the fruit of true repentance (as rebirth into a new man according to Christ). In such repentance, a person truly comes to know himself and his God, humbles himself before Him, becomes a worshiper of God in spirit and truth, and begins to love the Lord Jesus Christ, God the Father and the Holy Spirit with all his heart, mind and strength. It is in such repentance that reconciliation between man and God occurs, intimate personal knowledge of God by man and man by God, mutual love between God and man.

That is why Peter was saddened when he heard the question about love from the Lord for the third time, because he was afraid that his repentance was sufficient. After all, he knew from his experience that the Lord had forgiven him, that they had been reconciled, that God had shown him His love in response to Peter’s repentant love. Why does the Lord ask as if none of this happened? And overcoming his sadness from bewilderment, Peter adds to his third statement: “ God! You know everything;" - reminding the Lord of their meetings of love at his repentance. By this Peter seems to be saying: Lord, you know everything! You know how madly I sinned against You, how I came to my senses, how I repented later, how I grieved, how I lamented, how bitterly I wept and I wept, how I was tormented, how I repented and reviled myself, how I yearned for You, how I found You in repentance, how You visited me, supported and consoled me, how You had mercy on me, how you forgave this grave sin and other sins, how you healed my soul How we were reconciled, how I loved You with all my nature and being!

Lord, grant us the repentance of Peter, so that we may recognize You in our weeping, may we be reconciled with You, may we become friends, may we love You with all our healed being!

You should also know that besides the path of Judas and the path of Peter, there is a path for the rarest of the rare people on earth - this is the path of the most beloved disciple of the Great Lord, John the Theologian. He (like the Most Pure Mother of Jesus Christ) was the only one of the disciples who did not deny His Lord and did not leave Him before the cross and burial. He believed in His glorious resurrection before Peter. It was he, and not Peter, that the Lord entrusted to take care of His Most Pure Mother, adopting him to Her from the cross. That is why the opinion of some is erroneous, who claim that the Lord, in the person of John the Theologian, adopted all humanity as sons of the Mother of God. No! Virgin John the Theologian and Ever-Virgin Mary are a special spiritual race. The great Russian saints also belonged to this family: Venerable Seraphim Sarovsky (about whom, even in his adolescence, the Mother of God Herself, who appeared with John the Theologian, said: “This one is of our kind”) and the righteous prophet John of Kronstadt. This race is not subject to repentance (although they sometimes used it out of their humility), for from their mother’s womb they choose the Lord (the example of the Baptist John) and belong to the Lord, casting out their renunciation of Him with their prenatal choice.

These people are wondrous, wonderful, beautiful and incomprehensible to us. They didn't need to repent. They loved the Lord from their mother's womb once and for all. Their connection with the Lord is a great mystery. Each of them is also a great secret.

For us, corrupted by sin, there remains the path of Peter’s repentance or the path of the prudent thief’s confession on the cross.


The Lord Jesus Christ was taken into custody in the Garden of Gethsemane. All the apostles left the Savior and fled in fear. Only two of them, Peter and John, followed Him from afar.

It was late at night. Armed soldiers and temple guards brought the bound Savior to trial before the high priests: the elderly Annas and his son-in-law, the current high priest Caiaphas.
The Apostle John, known to the high priest, entered the courtyard, and then brought Peter in as well. Seeing Peter, the maid standing at the door asked him: “Peter answered: “.” The night was cold. The servants lit a fire in the yard and warmed themselves. Peter stood with them by the fire.

Soon another maid, pointing to Peter, said to the servants: “And this one was with Jesus of Nazareth.”

But Peter again denied, saying that he did not know this Man. Dawn was approaching, and the servants standing in the courtyard again began to say to Peter: "". A relative of the same Malchus, whose ear Peter had cut off, immediately approached and said that he had seen Peter together with Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane.

Then Peter began to swear and swear: "".

At this time the rooster crowed. And Peter remembered the words of the Savior spoken by Him at the Last Supper: “Before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times.”
At that very moment the Lord, who was taken out of the house, looked at Peter. The Savior's gaze penetrated into the very heart of the disciple. Shame and burning remorse gripped his soul. The apostle left the courtyard of the high priest and wept bitterly over his sin.

From that moment, Peter never forgot his fall. Saint Clement, a disciple of Peter, says that throughout his subsequent life, the apostle, at the first crowing of the rooster, knelt down and, shedding tears, repented of his renunciation, although the Lord Himself, soon after His resurrection, forgave him.
It's Friday morning. The entire Sanhedrin, led by the high priest Caiaphas, gathered for the trial of Jesus. The Lord Jesus Christ was condemned to death for calling Himself the Son of God.

When Judas the traitor learned of the death sentence, he realized the full horror of his insane act. Blinded by the love of money, he did not think about what his betrayal would lead to. A painful remorse took possession of his soul. But this repentance was combined in him with despair, and not with hope for God’s mercy and forgiveness.
Judas went to the high priests and elders and returned to them the thirty pieces of silver that he had received from them for betraying the Son of God. They treated Judas coldly and mockingly. “What is that to us,” they said, “be responsible for your own affairs.”

Torment of conscience without hope for God's forgiveness and faith in His love turned out to be fruitless. Judas could not correct what he had done with his own human strength. Unable to find the strength to fight mental anguish, he hanged himself that same night.
The high priests decided to use the money returned by Judas to buy a plot of land for the burial of wanderers.